By Mr. Thurmond (for himself and Mr. Nunn) (be request):
S. 727. A bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 1996 for military activities of the Department of Defense, to prescribe military personnel strengths for fiscal year 1996, and for other purposes; to the Committee on Armed Services.
Mr. Thurmon: Mr. President, by request, for myself and the senior Senator from Georgia [Mr. Nunn], I introduce, for appropriate reference, a bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 1996 for military activities of the Department of Defense, to prescribe military personnel strength for fiscal year 1996, and for other purposes.
I ask unanimous consent that a letter of transmittal requesting consideration of the legislation and a section-by-section analysis explaining its purpose be printed in the Record.
There being no objection, the material was ordered to be printed in the Record, as follows:
Dear Mr. President: The Department of Defense proposes the enclosed draft of legislation, "To authorize appropriations for fiscal year 1996 for military activities of the Department of Defense, to prescribe military personnel strengths for fiscal year 1996, and for other purposes."
This legislative proposal is part of the Department of Defense legislative program for the 104th Congress and is needed to carry out the President's budget plans for fiscal year 1996. The Office of Management and Budget advises that there is no objection to the presentation of this proposal to the Congress and that its enactment would be in accord with the program of the President.
This bill provides management authority for the Department of Defense in fiscal year 1996 and makes several changes to the authorities under which we operate. These changes are designed to permit a more efficient operation of the Department of Defense.
Enactment of this legislation is of great importance to the Department of Defense and the Department urges its speedy and favorable consideration.
Sections 101 through 107 provide procurement authorization for the Military Departments and for Defense-wide appropriations in amounts equal to the budget authority included in the President's budget for fiscal years 1996 and 1997.
Section 108 repeals the provisions of section 114(e) of title 10, United States Code, requirng a separate budget request for the procurement of Reserve equipment.
Section 201 provides for the authorization of each of the research, development, test, and evaluation appropriations for the Military Departments and Defense Agencies in amounts equal to the budget authority included in the President's budget for fiscal years 1996 and 1997.
Section 301 provides for authorization of the operation and maintenance appropriations of the Military Departments and Defense-wide appropriations in amounts equal to the budget authority included in the President's budget for fiscal years 1996 and 1997.
Section 302 authorizes appropriations for the Defense Business Operations Fund and the National Defense Salified Fund in amounts equal to the budget authority included in the President's budget for fiscal years 1996 and 1997. Section 303. Civilian Marksmanship Program fund Section 303 amends the provisions of section 4308 and 4313 of title 10, United States Code, relating to the Civilian Marksmanship Program, to reflect the President's Budget proposal that the Program be funded exclusively from reimbursements received in the execution of the program.
Section 304 amends section 316(b) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Years 1992 and 1993 to repeal limitations on the activities of the Defense Business Operations Fund
Section 305 amends the provisions of section 2218 of title 10, United States Code, relating to the National Defense Sealift Fund, to reflect the funding for the Ready Reserve Component of the Fleet by the Department of Defense as requested in the President's budget.
This section amends section 1206 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1995, which authorizes funds for the execution of the Cooperative Threat Reduction Act of 1993 (title XII of Public Law 103-160) by adding two new subsections.
New subsection (c) would permit funds appropriated to execute programs authorized by the Cooperative Threat Reduction Act to be utilized to reimburse the military personnel appropriations accounts for the pay and allowances paid to reserve component personnel for service while engaged in any program authorized by this Act. The utilization of Reserve component personnel, particularly in expansion of military-to-military and defense contacts, is particularly advantageous.
Permitting these funds to be used to reimburse the active military appropriations accounts removes a significant resource impediment to increasing the opportunities for ordering individual reserves to active duty with their consent as specified in section 513 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1995. A similar provision was passed by the 103rd Congress in section 1316 (a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1995 for Military-to-Military Contracts and Comparable Activities.
New subsection (d) would exempt members of a reserve component participating in activities or programs specified in the Cooperative Threat Reduction Act of 1993 who served over 180 days from counting against the authorized end strength for members of the armed forces on active duty under section 115(a)(1) of title 10 and against the senior grade strength limitations of sections 517 and 523 of title 10. Approval of this exemption from end strength and senior grade strength limitations removes an impediment to increasing the opportunities for ordering individual reserves to active duty with their consent as specified in section 513 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1995. A similar provision was passed by the 103rd Congress in section 1316 (c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1995 for Military-to-Military Contacts and Comparable Activities.
There are no additional costs associated with enacting this legislation.
This section would authorize the Secretary of the Army and the Secretary of the Air Force to provide for personnel of the National Guard, using funds appropriated for National Guard training exercises, to participate in joint exercises with the Army and Air Force to train for disaster and emergency response, and would thus allow these personnel to participate in such exercises in a Federally paid (title 32) status under state authority.
Under current law, Department of Defense funding for the National Guard may not be used for training the National Guard for disaster and emergency response. Funding for this training is the responsibility of the states and FEMA, and such training must be done in a state active duty status. This provision would authorize a limited exception to this allocation of responsibility by permitting use of Department of Defense funds and title 32 status for the Guard when engaged in joint exercises with the Army or Air Force for disaster and emergency response training. Disaster and emergency response training and exercises of the National Guard when not conducted in conjunction with the Army or the Air Force would continue to be a state and FEMA responsibility.
This amendment will ensure that National Guard personnel participating in joint exercises with members of the other components of their armed forces are eligible for the same protections and benefits as their counterparts from the Army Reserve, Air Force Reserve, and Regular components with whom they are participating. It will also avoid situations where lack of state or FEMA funds preclude participation by Guard units in joint exercises and thereby undermine the efficacy of those exercises.
The purpose of this legislation is to provide a means for rapid payment of claims and the rapid reimbursement of the insurance funds to protect commercial carriers assisting the Executive Branch from catastrophic losses associated with the destruction or damage to aircraft or ships while supporting the national interests of the United States. Allowing the Department of Defense to transfer any and all available funds will allow the United States, in these two vital reinsurance programs, to match standard commercial insurance practice for the timely payment required by financial arrangements common in the transportation industry today. Reporting and the requirements for supplemental appropriations, if any, ensures Congressional oversight at all stages.
Subsections (a) and (b) of the proposed legislation set forth the short title and the findings and purposes, respectively.
Subsection (c) of the proposed legislation amends section 44305 of title 49, United States Code, by adding a new subsection (c).
Subsection (c)(1) allows transfer of any funds available to the Department of Defense, regardless of the purpose of those funds. Although other authorities may exist to transfer funds, limitations as to amounts and priorities make these authorities insufficient to rapidly respond to the obligations of the Department of Defense under the current law, especially if contingencies or war-time conditions exist. Proposed language would not distinguish between types of insurance or risk, so long as the Federal Aviation Administration had issued a policy covering the risk. The language would not limit the authority to a specific fiscal year, but would be ongoing without need for reenactment periodically by Congress. Such Congressional oversight is already in place through the reauthorization of the Aviation Insurance Program, next scheduled to take place in 1997.
Subsection (c)(2) provides specific time limits with which the Secretary of Defense must pay claims and reimburse the Federal Aviation Administration. Notification to Congress and the 30 day delay before transfer [[Page S5807]] required in other statutes is waived. The most important issue for the air carriers is the replacement of the hull so that they may continue operations, including supporting the requesting agency, without idling crews or having to lay off personnel due to the lack of airframes. A longer time frame is provided for other claims, such as liability to third parties, as normal claims procedures can adequately protect their interests.
Subsection (c)(3) requires reports to Congress within 30 days of loss for amounts in excess of one million dollars, with periodic updates to ensure Congress is aware of amounts being transferred and paid out under the chapter 443 program. As supplemental appropriations may be necessary, Congress will have sufficient information on which to base a decision regarding the supplemental appropriations.
Subsection (d) of the proposed legislation amends section 1205 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1936, (46 App. U.S.C. Sec. 1285) by adding a new subsection 9c).
Subsection (c)(1) authorizes the Secretary of Defense to transfer funds available to the Department to pay claims by contractors, for the damage or loss of vessels and death or injury to personnel, insured pursuant to Title XII of the Merchant Marine Act, 1936, or loss or damage associated therewith. Proposed language would not distinguish between types of insurance or risk, so long as the Maritime Administration had issued a policy covering the risk. The language would not limit the authority to a specific fiscal year, but would be ongoing without need for reenactment periodically by Congress. Such Congressional oversight is already in place through the reauthorization of the Vessel War Risk Insurance Program, next scheduled to take place before the 30 June 1995 expiration (46 App. U.S.C. Sec. 1294).
Subsection (c)(2) provides specific time limits within which the Secretary of Defense must reimburse the Secretary of Transportation.
Subsection (c)(3) requires reports to Congress on a periodic basis for claims paid in amounts in excess of one million dollars to ensure Congress is aware of amounts being transferred and paid out under the Title XII program. As supplemental appropriations may be necessary, Congress will have sufficient information on which to base a decision regarding the supplemental appropriations.
The addition of subsection (c) to section 44305 of title 49, United States Code, and subsection (c) to section 1205 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1936, (46 App. U.S.C. Sec. 1285) would allow the Department of Defense to rapidly pay claims resulting from damages or injuries caused by risks covered by the respective programs as a consequence of providing transportation to the United States when commercial insurance companies refuse to cover such risks on reasonable terms and conditions. The requirement to reimburse the Federal Aviation Administration or the Maritime Administration already exists; however, the only method for payment currently available may involve requesting supplemental appropriations from Congress. Such a process historically has taken six months or longer. Many air carriers have indicated their financial obligations may not allow them to continue to support the United States if rapid payment for losses cannot be made. Commercial aircraft insurance policies and practice require payment in less than 30 days when cause is not an issue, usually within 72 hours.
If enacted, this legislation would not result in an increase in the budgetary requirements of the Department of Defense.
The purpose of this legislation is to eliminate the requirement to attempt complex, multi-shot-engagement scenarios with relatively immature Engineering Manufacturing Development hardware when these same scenarios must be performed with production-representative hardware during the Initial Operational Test and Evaluation (IOT&E) phase.
The requirement to demonstrate interceptor performance under operationally realistic conditions with production- representative hardware already exists. The premature duplication of this testing will only add greater technical complexity, cost, and risk to the program and provide little if any technical value.
Theater Missile Defense (TMD) interceptor performance will be performed during the Initial Operational Test and Evaluation (IOT&E) phase and results reported to Congress prior to the system being allowed to enter production. The Director of Operational Test and Evaluation, Office of the Secretary of Defense, will prepare and submit a Beyond Low- Rate Initial Production Report. This report will confirm that adequate testing, including multi-shot scenarios, has been completed. This testing must be conducted in operational environments and scenarios, consistent with conditions that the interceptor will be expected to operate in when fielded.
This section would authorize the Secretary of Defense to assign personnel of either the school system established under section 2164 of title 10 or the school system established by the Defense Dependents' Education Act of 1968 (title XIV of the Education Amendments of 1978; 20 U.S.C. 921 et seq.) to provide administrative, logistical, personnel, and other support services to the other system, either in addition to, or in place of, their normal duties. Such assignments may be for the period prescribed by the Secretary.
This section amends title 10 by adding a new section 2395a the purpose of which is to allow the Central Imagery Office (CIO), as a Combat Support Agency, to expend currently- programmed O&M and Procurement funds to establish, implement, and deploy a worldwide imagery architecture. Having flexibility to use these funds will provide the Central Imagery Office the ability to meet changing imagery requirements, ensure readiness, and provide timely support to military operations.
In the past, numerous studies and evaluations have indicated that the United States imagery system was unable to provide required imagery support in a timely manner. The experience of Desert Shield/Desert Storm reinforced those evaluations. The Central Imagery Office was created and assigned responsibility for enhancing the ability of the military departments, Unified Commands, their components, Joint Task Forces, tactical units, and other activities to make use of all imagery assets in a timely manner. The Accelerated Architecture Acquisition Initiative is a key program through which the Central Imagery Office will develop and field systems to provide real-time access to and dissemination from existing and planned imagery collection systems (national and theater) to defend and national users worldwide, real-time access to distributed digital imagery and imagery-product archives, and enhancements to and increases in the capacity of existing Department of Defense data networks to accommodate increased requirements from the imagery assets.
Critical to the success of the Accelerated Architecture Acquisition Initiative is centralized management and oversight to balance requirements to ensure successful development, procurement, and development of necessary hardware, software, communications, and services. Central Imagery Office must ensure the standardization, compatibility, and interoperability of equipment and processes to provide a worldwide system for required, timely imagery support. A key element the Accelerated Architecture Acquisition Initiative is the near-term provision to JCS- selected users of that equipment necessary to receive and use digital imagery products.
The Central Imagery Office's proposal provides the express language needed in the 1996 Appropriations Act for authority to purchase and deploy hardware, software, and communications, using Central Imagery Office funds, for activities funded in the Department of Defense-funded portion of the NFIP. Without this special provision, 31 U.S.C. section 1301A would prevent the Central Imagery Office from using funds appropriated to it in the defense-wide appropriation in this manner. The Central Imagery Office will be unable to carry out its intended emission to deliver Accelerated Architecture Acquisition Initiative capabilities to the organizations that require them and to establish successfully the Accelerated Architecture Acquisition Initiative architecture worldwide. This legislation will allow for an efficient and highly flexible way for the Central Imagery Office to deploy needed capabilities during crisis and emergencies, to meet changing imagery requirements, ensure readiness, and provide timely support to military operations.
Enactment of this proposal will not increase the budgetary requirement of the Department of Defense.
